Skip to content

The REAL Front Line War

25 August, 2013

Warfare. Not pretty…ever. However, we must realize that as long as there is money made by a few elitists, then we must also come to the scary conclusion that there will always be someone who is ready, willing, and possibly able to spill our blood – and not necessarily from the first few weapons of choice…you know…2nd Amendment to Constitution and all that?

What do I mean?

Oh, sorry. Let us digress for a sec. We forgot the pleasantries…

Greetings and welcome to another episode of The Countdown!

Thanks for stopping by to see what’s new on the menu…

Ok, back to today’s story…

Here, let someone better than us (of course it’s Wikipedia – so take with some salt) explain what we are really up against:

Sun Tzu considered war as a necessary evil that must be avoided whenever possible. The war should be fought swiftly to avoid economic losses: “No long war ever profited any country: 100 victories in 100 battles is simply ridiculous. Anyone who excels in defeating his enemies triumphs before his enemy’s threats become real”. According to the book, one must avoid massacres and atrocities because this can provoke resistance and possibly allow an enemy to turn the war in his favor.[3] For the victor, “the best policy is to capture the state intact; it should be destroyed only if no other options are available”.[3]

Sun Tzu emphasized the importance of positioning in military strategy. The decision to position an army must be based on both objective conditions in the physical environment and the subjective beliefs of other, competitive actors in that environment. He thought that strategy was not planning in the sense of working through an established list, but rather that it requires quick and appropriate responses to changing conditions. Planning works in a controlled environment; but in a changing environment, competing plans collide, creating unexpected situations. [FOUND HERE]

Sounds a lot like what is happening to this once great country, America,  founded on CHRISTIAN, GODLY principles and not on the modern communistic ones, that Mr. O and his “folks” seem to enjoy implementing…

Well let’s look at what military leaders know about the front lines of warfare…

Food can be used for warfare, both for conventional wars with a front-line and for modern day terrorist warfare. A recent example of food used as a weapon in a conventional war with a front-line is the Bosnian war of the early 1990s.

Food line

During the Bosnian war, closing off an area or city under siege and restricting the food supply was just as efficient as a weapon intended for political coercion as shelling the area or city. In that particular war both means were often used in combination, strangling the food supply chain and artillery shelling.

empty shelves

An example of food terrorism was the quicksilver poisoning of the Israeli Jaffa oranges by Palestinians three decades ago. The Palestinian idea was to create a scare to damage Israel’s economy since Jaffa oranges were a well-known Israeli trademark. When the news of the quicksilver poisoning came out, the scare caused was indeed considerable, especially when seen in the light of how few oranges were in fact poisoned.[MORE FOUND HERE]

The front lines are NOT just where the bullets and bombs are flying and landing. More accurately, THE front lines of warfare are really found in the dark, secret chambers; the secluded and hidden places, where subterfuge and stealth are the order for the day. Sometimes they are located in the board room, or some elitists’ private jet. Always hard to find, always hard to prove. Can anyone say plausible deniability?

‘Guns’ aren’t fired in the traditional ways, and the swords and knives aren’t necessarily made of metal…

What we are trying to imply – finally getting down to the point – is that THE REAL front lines of warfare are exactly what the American government, for the most part, is doing to it’s own people, i.e. attacking what they need to survive – water, food, air and jobs.

Plain and simple.

Any military strategist knows to control a population, you must control the food and water supply (as well as have control of the commercial infrastructure – interstates, road, banks etc., but today we are mainly going to focus on the first three).

If those elitists few can also gain control of the air, then all the better. After all, it’s hard  to breathe in polluted air or toxic chemicals sprayed into the skies. You know the planes making those long cloud trails from one side to the other and crisscross apple sauce, all over again?

Weather modification is now possible. Attempts to modify the weather have been made since at least the late 1940s. In 1947 the US Navy, Army, and Air Force, working with General Electric Corporation, made the first attempt to modify a hurricane under Project Cirrus, by dropping about 80 pounds of dry ice into clouds.

Project Cumulus, carried out by the British Royal Air Force between 1949 and 1952, included cloud seeding experiments over southern England. It was allegedly responsible for the 1952 flood in the Devon village of Lynmouth, which resulted in 34 deaths and the destruction of multiple structures.

In the 1950s the US Forest Service carried out a project called Skyfire in which they experimented with cloud seeding techniques to decrease lightning in order to reduce forest fires. Then, under Project Stormfury from 1962 to 1983, the United States Government tried to disrupt the inner structure of hurricanes in the Atlantic by flying aircraft into them, and seeding them with silver iodide.

Weather modification involves three major categories: suppression of weather patterns, intensification of weather patterns, and in some cases the introduction of completely new weather patterns. The two basic methods to accomplish weather modification include cloud seeding and directed-energy.

Multiple countries, including the United States, are now modifying the weather. In November of 1997 the Wall Street Journal reported that in order to dissipate excess fog, the Malaysian government would be signing an agreement with Russian officials for use of technology which would allow them to create a cyclone.

The state-run Oklahoma Weather Modification Program conducts cloud seeding operations in Oklahoma to enhance the development of rain showers and thunderstorms. In October of 2005, Business Week reported that China, Russia, and Mexico are modifying the weather, with China spending about $40 million a year on a weather management program.

Since the early 1960s Weather Modification Incorporated of Fargo North Dakota has offered a professional weather modification service to insurance companies, water resource management groups, and federal and state government research organizations. They specialize in weather modification, cloud seeding, rain enhancement, and fog dispersion.[ARTICLE FOUND HERE]

Now doesn’t that say something about the devastation that JUST happened in Oklahoma? Maybe their little Weather Modification Program attacked, damaged and killed their own people?!


Here again, hard to prove without someone doing the work like this guy:[BLOG SITE FOUND HERE]

We here at The Countdown have been on these front lines for about four to six years now(the first two or so were just gathering material and research), doing more research, working hard, saving what we can and planning to free ourselves from this failure of a ‘SYSTEM’ called International or Global __________(just fill in the blank).

We may be extreme, but take a moment to consider who your enemy REALLY is. In order to defeat your enemy, you must know them and their Modus Operandi.

The very first enemy was Lucifer, an arch angel in Heaven. This angel was basically God’s 2nd in command. Also, he was put in charge of the worship in Heaven.

He was created to be in charge of a fourth of the animal kingdom (according to The Book of Enoch), and was made to reflect glory given to God. But he started to get a big head. He started taking that glory for himself and got prideful. Well, the Lord Jehovah kicked that angel dude, Lucifer, right outta the sky, along with a third of the angels that decided to go along with his shenanigans, for his pride,rebellion(witchcraft),evil influence on other angels, and illicit trade that was going on the heavens and finally the warfare that he started against his creator. Now he’s known more commonly as satan…

Although there are great and seemingly impenetrable mysteries connected with the fall of Satan and man, there are nevertheless several passages in the Bible that probably refer to Satan’s fall and therefore throw light on it and on sin in general. I acknowledge that they do not necessarily refer to Satan; our observations on them must be tentative. Still they seem to refer to Satan and are not inconsistent with what we either know or can guess about him. The first such passage is Ezekiel 28:12-15. Earlier in this chapter there is a prophecy against the prince or ruler of Tyre, an important ancient city on the Mediterranean coast. The person involved is obviously a human ruler. In fact, it is said of him, “You are a man and not a god” (v. 2), though he boasted of being one. But after this prophecy there is a heightened or extended prophecy against the king of Tyre, which does not at all appear to be dealing with a mere mortal. It seems to be dealing with Satan or a satanic power that stood behind the earthly throne just as, by contrast, God Himself may be said to stand behind a godly ruler. It is from this section of the chapter that verses 12-15 come.

Satan was probably what we would call God’s prime minister, to use a human analogy. He was to speak for God, administering the universe in God’s name. He was to direct the worship and obedience of all created beings back to God. This was a very high position, indeed the highest possible position save that of God Himself. But he was still a creature rather than the Creator, and when he aspired to be more than a creature he sinned. The text says tersely and without any further explanation, “You were blameless in your ways from the day you were created till wickedness was found in you” (v. 15).


The second passage that throws light on the nature and fall of Satan is Isaiah 14:12-15. Again, this is a difficult passage to be sure of. Like Ezekiel 28:12-15, it occurs in the midst of a chapter dealing with the wickedness of an earthly king, in this case the king of Babylon. But the language of these particular verses seems to have a greater reference than this, and a quotation of verse 12 by Jesus in reference to Satan in Luke 10:18 seems to link these verses to him. They say,

“How you have fallen from heaven, O morning star, son of the dawn! You have been cast down to the earth, you who once laid low the nations! You said in your heart, ‘I will ascend to heaven; I will raise my throne above the stars of God; I will sit enthroned on the mount of assembly, on the utmost heights of the sacred mountain. I will ascend above the tops of the clouds; I will make myself like the Most High.’ But you are brought down to the grave, to the depths of the pit.”

Two characteristics of these verses strike us. First, there is an ascending chain of ambition leading from the lower heavens through the stars to the mount of the congregation, to the utmost heights of the mountain above the stars to the very throne of God. Satan was attempting to displace God. Second, there is a fivefold repetition of the words “I will”-three times in verse 13 and twice in verse 14. Before this all was at harmony in the universe. There was one mind or one will. Now there was a second, dissonant will, and there has been a multiplicity of wills and disharmony since.

In Scripture the word “heaven” is used to refer to three different spheres. The first heaven is what we call the sky or atmosphere. It is where the birds fly. The second is what we would call space. It is where the created universe has been situated. The third heaven envelops everything and yet is more than all we can possibly see or know. It is the abode of God Himself and is beyond our full understanding. Satan dwelt in the second heaven, though he also had access to the third (cf. Job 1:6; 2:1). When we read of his desire to ascend “into heaven,” what is probably in view is his sinful and base desire to take God’s abode away from Him.

When Satan says, “I will raise my throne above the stars of God,” we are probably to understand this as a reference to the other angels. Job 38:7 uses the phrase this way (“while the morning stars sang together and all the angels shouted for joy”). Satan was probably saying that he would usurp authority over the rest of the angelic creation.

Isaiah 2:2 and Psalm 48:2 throw light on “the mount of assembly.” This has an earthly reference to Jerusalem in which the people of God would gather to worship. It also apparently has reference to a heavenly gathering of God’s people. When Satan said that he wanted to be enthroned on this mountain he was saying that he wanted to receive their worship.

Finally, there is a reference to the “clouds” of God. If this is referring to mere atmospheric clouds, the progression of these verses is broken. But it may refer to that special “glory cloud,” the Shekinah, which appeared to and was with Israel during the days of her wilderness wandering. It moved before the people to indicate the direction they should be going and spread out over them to give shade during the daytime and warmth at night. It symbolized God’s presence with the people. In my judgment the reference to “the tops of the clouds” in Isaiah 14:14 is to this cloud, which symbolizes God.

Immediately after this Satan declares with emphasis, “I will make myself like the Most High.” Why “the Most High”? God has many names. Why did Satan choose this particular name to express his ambitions? Donald Grey Barnhouse answers, “In the story of Abram we have the record of an incident revealing the inwardness of the name ‘the Most High.’ Abram was returning home after the battle with the kings and the deliverance of Lot. We read that ‘Melchizedek, king of Salem, brought forth bread and wine [the communion elements]; and he was the priest of the most high God. And he blessed him, and said, Blessed be Abram of the most high God, possessor of heaven and earth. . .’ (Gen. 14:18, 19). Here is the key to the pride of Satan. God is revealed as El Elyon, the Most High God, and in this character he is ‘the possessor of heaven and earth.’ This is what Lucifer wanted to be. His rebellion was not a request for God to move over so that he might share God’s throne. It was a thrust at God himself. It was an attempt to put God out so that Satan might take his place as possessor of the heavens and the earth.”

Clearly, when Satan appears in Eden in the guise of the serpent to tempt Eve and Adam, it is a renewed attempt to further this ambition. Having failed to take heaven, he is nevertheless determined to consolidate his hold on earth through earth’s inhabitants.

The second prominent feature of the Isaiah passage is Satan’s fivefold repetition of the words “I will.” He said, “I will . . . I will . . . I will . . . I will . . . I will . . .” This feature gives insight into the nature of sin and possibly into the reason why God permits it and its accompanying evils in His universe.

Suppose for some reason that the word “sin” was suddenly eradicated from the English vocabulary, and suppose we still had the task of telling men and women about their need of God and of God’s work of restoration through Christ. How could we go about it? One way we could go about it would be to speak of “sin” as the existence of a contrary “will” in God’s universe. Before Satan’s fall there was only one will. It was God’s will; it was perfect. After Satan’s rebellion there were two wills-Satan’s and God’s-but, of course, only one of the two was perfect-God’s. When Adam and Eve were created there was an immediate problem as to which of the two they would follow. Satan thought he would get Adam and Eve to follow him. Although he got them to rebel against God, he did not succeed in getting them to follow his will. So, there were now four wills, each going its own way and only one of them (God’s will) remaining perfect. In time there were six wills, as Abel and Cain were added. Then there were sixteen wills and thirty-two and sixty-four. Today there are billions of.wills, which explains the constant conflicts in the human race. But it is still the case that only one, the will of God almighty, is perfect and totally desirable.

Satan has been trying to fashion these rebellious and mutually hostile wills into a kingdom, but with very few exceptions he has been monumentally unsuccessful. God’s permission of evil allows this truth to become increasingly evident.

But what Satan cannot do, God does. In Christ He is drawing the wills of His people back to Himself and establishing harmony where there was chaos before. That is why Paul admonishes us to be “transformed by the renewing of” our minds so that we will be able “to test and approve what God’s will is” (Rom. 12:2). It is why he says, “We demolish arguments and every pretension that sets itself up against the knowledge of God, and we take captive every thought to make it obedient to Christ” (2 Cor. 10:4, 5).[MORE FOUND HERE]

For more on this subject, maybe this video will help…don’t forgret your popcorn, it’s almost two hours…

On a separate yet relevant note look at how prideful Mr. O. looks:

smug MrOone

smug MrOtwo

smug MrOthree“Anyone with their nose stuck that high is certainly going to have breathing problems when it rains…if ya know what I mean” – treburn

Barack Obama is a narcissist.

Dr. Sam Vaknin, the author of the Malignant Self Love believes “Barack Obama appears to be a narcissist.” Vaknin is a world authority on narcissism. He understands narcissism and describes the inner mind of a narcissist like no other person. When he talks about narcissism everyone listens. Vaknin says that Obama’s language, posture and demeanor, and the testimonies of his closest, dearest and nearest suggest that the Senator is either a narcissist or he may have narcissistic personality disorder (NPD). Narcissists project a grandiose but false image of themselves. Jim Jones, the charismatic leader of People’s Temple, the man who led over 900 of his followers to cheerfully commit mass suicide and even murder their own children was also a narcissist. David Koresh, Charles Manson, Joseph Koni, Shoko Asahara, Stalin, Saddam, Mao, Kim Jong Ill and Adolph Hitler are a few examples of narcissists of our time. All these men had a tremendous influence over their fanciers. They created a personality cult around themselves and with their blazing speeches elevated their admirers, filled their hearts with enthusiasm and instilled in their minds a new zest for life. They gave them hope! They promised them the moon, but alas, invariably they brought them to their doom. When you are a victim of a cult of personality, you don’t know it until it is too late. One determining factor in the development of NPD is childhood abuse.

“Obama’s early life was decidedly chaotic and replete with traumatic and mentally bruising dislocations,” says Vaknin. “Mixed-race marriages were even less common then. His parents went through a divorce when he was an infant (two years old). Obama saw his father only once again, before he died in a car accident. Then his mother re-married and Obama had to relocate to Indonesia, a foreign land with a radically foreign culture, to be raised by a step-father. At the age of ten, he was whisked off to live with his maternal (white) grandparents. He saw his mother only intermittently in the following few years and then she vanished from his life in 1979. She died of cancer in 1995”.

One must never underestimate the manipulative genius of pathological narcissists. They project such an imposing personality that it overwhelms those around them. Charmed by the charisma of the narcissist, people become like clay in his hands. They cheerfully do his bidding and delight to be at his service. The narcissist shapes the world around himself and reduces others in his own inverted image. He creates a cult of personality. His admirers become his co-dependents. Narcissists have no interest in things that do not help them to reach their personal objective. They are focused on one thing alone and that is power.[PHOTO AND ARTICLE FOUND HERE]

Knowing this about the first enemy, it’s really easy to see his work manifesting today, in America; in the morals, lifestyles, families, and government.

Can anyone else see these parallels or is it just us?

When you take God, the ONE AND ONLY creator of everything, and HIS rightful worship out of your life and everyone else’s; out of home, work and government, what do you expect to fill the void of what was once ‘a shining light on the hill’?

You quench the ‘flame’, and darkness WILL surround you…think about it.

War is Hell.

Hell is a place for those who chose to be apart from ALL things good, truthful, loving and pure. God. They will experience that darkness forever and a day…

Heaven is the place to choose to be with God forever. Pure and simple – even three year olds can grasp this!

More still to come on this topic, but for now…


No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: